전체검색

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

It would be forged sufficiency if industriousness were outlay its ain money to endeavour to set bastardly ideas in the world mind, only when manufacture is permitted to do it "for free," someone in a high place ought to stand up and holler. The choice of prepositions depends upon the temporal context in which you're speaking. "On ~ afternoon" implies that the afternoon is a single point in time; thus, that temporal context would take the entire afternoon as one of several different afternoons, or in other words, one would use "on" when speaking within the context of an entire week. Another comment, above, mentioned that this phrase is acceptable in advertising circles. Advertisers now use this syntactical abomination freely, as they carelessly appeal to our lower natures, and matching intellects. These matches cast a rather different light on the probable locus of early use of the expression. Although the 1947 instance of the expression cited in my original answer appears in The Billboard, I interpreted it as an attempt at faux hick talk by the reporter. But The Billboard is also the source of four of the eleven matches from 1943–1944, including the earliest one, and none of those instances show any sign of working in an unfamiliar dialect.
Thinking that he was an old wanderer from his gray beard, they dined him and as Lem didn't tip his duke they gave him a buck and two years subscription for the Hog Cholera Monthly for free. Before our hero could locate a hotel he was surrounded by a group of natives, who greeted him royally, Anal Sex Porn Videos offering him free room and board (pitch-'til-you-win style). Suddenly a group of local business men kidnaped him from the crowd and rushed him to the best hotel in town where he was given for free a suite of rooms.
In each case, the phrase "release of" means "open of," "unstained by," or simply "without." In contrast, "relieve from" suggests "emancipated from" or "no thirster laden by." The phrase "unloosen of charge" (blue line) has always been vastly more common than "rid from charge" (red line), as this Ngram graph shows. But I want to point out a couple of things that surprised me when I looked into possible differences between "justify of" and "give up from." If you can remove these things from your life, you are "unblock from" the undesirable attention (attack) of these things. If we extend the conceptualization to the word "freedom," I think we'll find more basis for differentiation in the choices between "relinquish of" and "unloosen from." So let's try a few examples.
But in the United States the days when using "for free" marked you as a probable resident of Goat's Whiskers, Kentucky, are long gone. Finally, my answer is based not only on the reference I cited but also on my 28 years of experience as a copy editor (and a reader of books on usage) and on my 45+ years as a close reader of literature and nonfiction. As I said, I'm not entirely sold on this analysis, because I think most people either use "liberate of" and "release from" interchangeably—except in the case of "discharge of charge"—or arbitrarily prefer one or the other form to express the same idea, without having any finer distinctions in mind.
There is nothing wrong with changing your choice of words slightly to convey the same sentiment. If we become too fixated on using a particular phrase it can detract from what we finally say. So rather than searching to find a perfect antonym, make use of all the other beautiful words we have which will get your point across. An example sentence would be really useful to show what you want the opposite of. Any word that can be used and interpreted in so many ways as free needs contextual background if we are to understand what you're asking for. The use of "myself" and similar reflexives for emphasis is normal English usage of the word. This particular speaker wanted to place emphasis on the fact that they personally were one of the people you could contact for information. In recent decades, however, use of "for free" to mean "at no cost" has skyrocketed.
Established media, news, and entertainment corporations have also created and expanded their visibility to YouTube channels to reach bigger audiences. "In ~ afternoon" suggests that the afternoon is a temporal space in-and-of-itself, wherein anything that happens will happen amongst many other events. In other words, the temporal context for this usage would be if one were speaking of a single day -- whether past, present, or future -- and of a single afternoon, during which many things might happen. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. YouTube has had unprecedented social impact, influencing popular culture, internet trends, and creating multimillionaire celebrities. I believe the puzzle comes from the common but mistaken belief that prepositions must have noun-phrase object complements. Since for is a preposition and free is an adjective, the reasoning goes, there must be something wrong. The fact is that even the most conservative of dictionaries, grammars, and usage books allow for constructions like although citizens disapprove of the Brigade's tactics, they yet view them as necessary or it came out from under the bed.